In the intricate tapestry of existence, the omnipotent threads of scientific theory and law weave seamlessly, dictating the very essence of our being. These governing principles, whether acknowledged or not, exert their influence over every facet of human existence. It is an inescapable truth that binds us all in a cosmic dance with the empirical forces that govern our universe. From the macrocosmic realms of celestial bodies to the microcosmic intricacies of subatomic particles, the reach of scientific theory and law extends, leaving an indelible mark on the rhythm of life. This article will give an overview of scientific theory and scientific law.
The Inescapable Web of Connection
Within this grand narrative of scientific principles, each one of us finds our place—a node in the vast network of cause and effect. Directly or indirectly, consciously or inadvertently, we are entwined in the intricate dance choreographed by the laws of nature. Our very existence, from the molecular dance within our cells to the gravitational pull that anchors us to this planet, is a testament to the pervasive reach of scientific theory and law. It is the unseen force shaping our reality, an invisible hand guiding the course of our journey through time and space.
The Dynamic Interplay of Existence
Life unfolds as a dynamic interplay between scientific theory and law, where each moment is a manifestation of these fundamental principles. Scientific theory, the intellectual framework that seeks to explain the workings of the universe, provides us with a roadmap to navigate the complexities of existence. Meanwhile, scientific law, the immutable rules governing the behavior of matter and energy, acts as the unwavering guide steering the ship of life through the uncharted waters of the cosmos. Together, they form the backbone of our understanding, the compass that points towards the undiscovered territories of knowledge.
A Symbiotic Relationship with Nature
In our pursuit of knowledge, we become both explorers and subjects, unraveling the mysteries of the universe while simultaneously being governed by its laws. It is a symbiotic relationship where our comprehension of scientific theory deepens our connection with the world around us. From the biological mechanisms that sustain life to the intricate balance of ecosystems, every revelation adds a layer to the intricate tapestry of understanding, reinforcing the inextricable link between humanity and the scientific principles that underpin our reality.
The Ever-Expanding Horizon of Discovery
As we stand on the precipice of discovery, the horizon of scientific knowledge stretches infinitely before us. Scientific theory and law, like beacons of enlightenment, guide us into the uncharted territories of the unknown. With each breakthrough, the boundaries of our understanding expand, revealing new vistas of comprehension and posing new questions to satiate our insatiable curiosity. It is a journey of perpetual discovery, an odyssey where the interplay of scientific theory and law continues to shape the narrative of human exploration and understanding.
Scientific theory and scientific law
A scientific law, a cornerstone of empirical understanding, is a profound statement derived from a multitude of meticulously conducted experiments. These laws, rooted in repeated observations, meticulously detail facets of our complex world. Underpinning their significance is the steadfast applicability they exhibit under identical conditions. Moreover, they signify a profound causal relationship embedded within their constituent elements. Scientific laws exist in symbiosis with scientific theories, forming an intricate web of comprehension and explanation.
Hypotheses and Comprehensive Scientific Theories
While a hypothesis tentatively ventures into the realm of explanation for a particular phenomenon, a scientific theory delves deep into the intricacies of observed occurrences. According to the erudite scholars at Kennesaw State University, a scientific law, conversely, serves as a statement encapsulating either an observed phenomenon or a unifying concept. Notably, the renowned Newton’s law, while a stalwart in its predictions, falls short of elucidating the essence of gravity—what it is and the mechanisms governing its operation. The realm of scientific theories and laws unfolds as a tapestry of nuanced understanding.
Eponymous Laws: Insights Named After Pioneers
In the expansive landscape of scientific exploration, there emerges a fascinating category of laws—eponymous laws. This curated list encapsulates laws, principles, and adages intrinsically linked to the individuals who birthed them. These individuals, often pioneers in their respective fields, have left an indelible mark, immortalized in the nomenclature of these laws. Each entry in this compendium offers a portal into the intellectual legacy of those who, through their insight and innovation, have contributed to the edifice of scientific theory and law.
Scientific Law: A Foundation of Predictable Phenomena
A scientific regulation serves as an eloquent articulation of phenomena that unfailingly unfold under specific circumstances. One quintessential illustration of this concept lies in the realm of physical science, epitomized by Newton’s trilogy: the First Law of motion, the Second Law of motion, and the Law of universal gravitation. Each of these laws encapsulates the inherent predictability governing motion and gravitational forces.
Newton’s laws, however, are just a fraction of the vast tapestry of scientific laws, also denoted as “laws of nature.” Beyond the domain of motion and gravity, one encounters the encompassing principles like the laws of thermodynamics, Boyle’s law concerning gases, and the gravitational laws that extend beyond Newton’s formulations. These scientific laws collectively form the bedrock of understanding the regularities in the physical world.
The Genesis of Scientific Laws: A Tapestry Woven by Experiments
Scientific laws, in their essence, are not arbitrary proclamations; rather, they are meticulous deductions derived from a compendium of repeated scientific experiments and observations spanning considerable periods. Their acceptance as universal truths within the scientific community underscores the rigor and reliability of the processes leading to their formulation. The journey towards establishing a scientific law entails a convergence of empirical evidence, transforming disparate observations into coherent and irrefutable principles.
Defined succinctly, a scientific law is an abstraction crafted from specific data, pertinent to a well-defined group or class of phenomena. This abstraction is expressible through the unequivocal assertion that a particular phenomenon unfailingly occurs under specific, delineated conditions. The articulation of scientific laws, therefore, emerges as a fundamental objective of scientific inquiry, paving the way for a lucid understanding of the intricate interplay of forces and elements within our environment.
Scientific Law Unveiled: A Statement of Unyielding Regularity
At its core, a scientific law is a declarative statement founded upon the bedrock of repeated experimental observations. These statements, far from being ephemeral or context-dependent, exhibit a steadfast permanence. A scientific law, once articulated, stands unwaveringly under the same conditions, serving as an unyielding testament to the inherent predictability of certain aspects of the natural world.
The implicit implication within a scientific law is profound—an intricate web of cause and effect relationships intricately interwoven within the elements of scientific theory. It asserts not merely the coexistence of phenomena but establishes a causal connection, unraveling the intricacies of how certain conditions inexorably lead to specific outcomes. In essence, a scientific law provides a conceptual lens through which the intricate dance of elements within the scientific realm becomes comprehensible.
Decoding the Essence: Scientific Law in Definition and Practice
In the lexicon of science, a scientific law encapsulates a distinctive identity. It is not a conjecture or a tentative hypothesis but a resolute statement grounded in the empirical foundation of repeated experimental observations. It embodies a steadfast assurance that, within the prescribed conditions, a particular facet of the world will invariably manifest. In navigating the expansive terrain of scientific exploration, these laws stand as indispensable guideposts, illuminating the path toward a more profound comprehension of the intricate mechanisms governing our physical reality.
Law Definition Science
In the realm of scientific exploration, a law is not merely a legislative decree, but a profound and generalized rule, meticulously crafted to elucidate a complex tapestry of observations. It stands as a stalwart, either in the form of a nuanced verbal expression or a meticulously formulated mathematical statement. These laws, akin to the stalwart pillars of scientific understanding, serve as the scaffolding upon which the edifice of knowledge is erected.
Scientific laws, often adorned with the epithet of “natural laws,” are not capricious in their application. Instead, they wield a discerning causality, delineating the cause and effect with an unwavering precision. Under the discerning gaze of scientific theory and the imperious mandate of scientific law, these laws are unwaveringly expected to apply universally, retaining their authoritative grip under the exacting and reproducible circumstances that birthed them.
Define Scientific Law
To define a scientific law is to embark on a linguistic expedition into the heart of empirical regularity. It stands as a distilled and generalized rule, a linguistic symphony orchestrating the myriad observations that collectively weave the fabric of scientific understanding. Whether articulated in the poetic cadence of verbal expression or the exacting syntax of mathematical precision, these laws encapsulate the essence of scientific wisdom.
These scientific laws, interchangeably referred to as natural laws, bear the solemn responsibility of indicating a causal dance between observed elements. Under the aegis of scientific theory and the authoritative mantle of scientific law, they are not merely rhetorical flourishes but stern pronouncements on the unyielding relationship between cause and effect. Immutable, they stand as pillars of certainty, unswayed by the capricious winds of circumstance.
Scientific Law Definition Dictionary
In the hallowed pages of scientific dictionaries, a scientific law is not a mere lexical entry but a profound statement forged from the crucible of repeated experimental observations. It stands as a testament to the meticulous scrutiny of the world, a linguistic beacon that describes with unerring precision some facet of our intricate reality. This definition, a marriage of empirical rigor and linguistic finesse, captures the essence of scientific laws as crystalline articulations of the observed intricacies in the grand theater of existence.
Scientific laws, by their very nature, are not capricious musings but steadfast declarations that unfurl their authority under a specific set of circumstances. Through the alchemy of repetition, these laws etch their indelible mark on the scientific landscape. The causal relationships they imply, illuminated by the guiding lights of Scientific theory and scientific law, weave a narrative of interconnection, implying that the observed elements are not solitary actors but dancers in a cosmic ballet choreographed by the laws themselves.
Scientific Law in a Sentence
In the vast expanse of social sciences, an exemplar of the scientific law emerges in the form of Zipf’s law, an eloquent expression of the structured order underlying seemingly chaotic phenomena. It serves as a testament to the versatility of scientific laws, transcending disciplinary boundaries to elucidate patterns in the societal tapestry. Yet, amidst this intellectual richness, a caveat resonates—the humility to acknowledge that scientific laws, formidable though they may be, possess the inherent potential for fallibility. A recognition that, while our scientific laws may flirt with the boundaries of error, the transgressions are not of catastrophic consequence.
Scientific Laws and Mathematical Constants
Peering through the lens of mathematically elementary viewpoints, a captivating interplay between scientific laws and universal constants unfolds. These constants, emerging like celestial bodies in the mathematical firmament, find their origin in the bosom of scientific laws. It is a testament to the inherent elegance and interconnectedness of the scientific fabric that these constants, seemingly immutable and universal, blossom from the fertile ground of rigorous scientific laws. This symbiotic relationship, an intricate dance of mathematical elegance and empirical grounding, underscores the profound interdependence between the quantitative edifice of constants and the qualitative depth of scientific laws.
Define Law in Science
To define law in science is to embark on a linguistic odyssey, navigating through the intricate terrain of generalized rules poised to explain the multifaceted tableau of observations. It is a verbal or mathematical articulation, a linguistic Rosetta Stone deciphering the cryptic language of the observed world. Scientific laws, often adorned with the moniker of natural laws, stand as sentinels of causation, delineating with unwavering certainty the cause-and-effect relationships between observed elements. The conditions under which these laws unfurl their authoritative banner are stringent and non-negotiable, a testament to their universal applicability under the ever-watchful gaze of Scientific theory and scientific law.
Scientific Theory and Scientific Law
The demarcation between scientific theory and scientific law unveils a nuanced interplay of explanation and summation within the vast expanse of scientific inquiry. A hypothesis, akin to a fledgling thought taking its first breath, is a tentative and circumscribed explanation of a phenomenon. It flutters on the periphery, beckoning further investigation to either bolster or dismantle its embryonic foundations.
In stark contrast, a scientific theory dons the mantle of profundity, providing an exhaustive and comprehensive elucidation of the observed phenomenon. It delves into the intricate layers of causation, unfurling the complexities with a scholarly finesse that transcends the ephemeral nature of mere speculation. Where hypotheses tiptoe, theories boldly stride, weaving a narrative that connects disparate threads of observation into a cohesive tapestry of understanding.
A scientific law, however, assumes the role of a declarative authority within this intellectual landscape. It stands as a statement, an elegant encapsulation of the relationship between variables observed in the scientific realm. Yet, the enigma persists, for while laws succinctly state what is, the elusive ‘why’ remains shrouded in the impenetrable mist of scientific exploration. Newton’s law of gravity, for instance, delineates the gravitational dance of celestial bodies but veils the underlying nature of gravity itself.
Science and Law
In the intricate dance between science and law, a symbiotic relationship emerges, intertwining the meticulous rigidity of legal frameworks with the boundless curiosity of scientific exploration. The assertion that “legislation is science” echoes the recognition that the legal precepts governing societal conduct find grounding in the empirical and rational foundations akin to scientific methodology.
Scientific laws, those succinct pronouncements on observed phenomena, stand as the silent sentinels within this union. They are, in essence, the delineations of the intricacies of the natural world, akin to legal statutes outlining the parameters of permissible behavior. Yet, herein lies a crucial distinction – while a scientific law meticulously describes what occurs in the observed phenomenon, it remains stoically mute on the ‘why’ and ‘how.’
Science, Law, and the Illusion of Transformation
The assertion that theories metamorphose into laws with the alchemy of sufficient research is, indeed, a misconception that demands elucidation. Theories, the architects of understanding, unfurl the intricate tapestry of causation, beckoning researchers into the labyrinthine corridors of ‘why’ and ‘how.’ In contrast, laws, with their concise articulation, remain the watchmen of the ‘what’ and ‘when,’ standing firm in their observational prowess.
The notion that theories seamlessly transition into laws belies the inherent distinction in their essence. Theories, like the philosopher’s stone, delve into the profound depths of explanation, while laws, akin to the unyielding rock, stand testament to observed regularities. The alchemy of scientific exploration respects the autonomy of each, intertwining them in a dance that enriches the intellectual panorama.
Example of the Law in Science
The realm of scientific laws unfolds as a succinct and undeniable testament to the precision inherent in the natural world. These laws, concise and unwavering, distill complex phenomena into pithy statements, often adorned with the elegance of mathematical equations. In the symphony of scientific understanding, they resonate as short, sweet, and eternally true declarations.
Consider the laws of thermodynamics, those immutable principles governing energy transfer and transformation. Boyle’s law of gases, articulating the relationship between pressure and volume, stands as another testament to the concise eloquence of scientific laws. And then, there are the gravitational laws, the invisible threads that weave the celestial ballet, underpinning the elegant dance of heavenly bodies. Each law, a succinct embodiment of nature’s regularities, stands as a beacon in the labyrinth of scientific exploration, guiding humanity through the intricacies of the cosmos.
Hypothesis, Theory, and Law
In the crucible of scientific inquiry, the trio of hypothesis, theory, and law orchestrates a harmonious symphony, each note resonating with a distinct purpose. The hypothesis emerges as a tentative muse, a proposition waiting to be tested under the scrutinizing gaze of experimentation. It is the ephemeral whisper that prompts further investigation, a beckoning call to unravel the mysteries latent in the scientific tapestry.
A theory, in stark contradistinction, is the magnum opus of scientific thought. It is not a mere supposition but a well-supported and intricate explanation, a scholarly treatise on the observed phenomena. Theories stand as intellectual bastions, weathering the storms of empirical scrutiny with a resilience born of comprehensive understanding. They are the scaffolding upon which the edifice of scientific knowledge is erected, a testament to the human quest for comprehension.
Meanwhile, a scientific law, with its declarative resonance, steps onto the stage as the maestro orchestrates the dance of variables. It is a statement, succinct and authoritative, encapsulating the relationship between observed elements. Yet, in this triumvirate, it is the law that stops short of the profound ‘why,’ leaving the inquisitive minds lingering on the threshold of understanding.
Hypothesis, Theory, Law, and Experiment
As the scientific narrative unfolds, the quartet of hypothesis, theory, law, and experiment weaves a rich tapestry of methodical exploration. The hypothesis, a tentative foray into the unknown, sparks the flame of curiosity, inviting the rigors of controlled experimentation to validate or refute its embryonic proposition.
The theory, a scholarly opus, rises like a majestic peak, offering a panoramic view of the observed phenomena. It is the culmination of meticulous observation, data synthesis, and intellectual rigor, standing as a testament to the human capacity to decipher the intricacies of the natural world.
The law, a declarative proclamation, asserts its authority over the observed relationships between variables. Yet, it remains a sentinel at the threshold of understanding, acknowledging the limitations of its concise statements in unraveling the profound mysteries of ‘why.’
And within the controlled confines of the experiment, the scientific method unfurls its disciplined methodology, a crucible where hypotheses are tested, theories validated, laws affirmed, and the symphony of scientific inquiry resonates with the harmonious chords of discovery.
Scientific Theories and Laws
Within the intricate tapestry of scientific discourse, the dichotomy between laws and theories emerges as a nuanced dance of explanation and description. A scientific law, like an astute observer, keenly describes a phenomenon without delving into the labyrinthine corridors of causation. It is a snapshot frozen in the amber of scientific understanding, capturing the essence of what is without unraveling the mystery of why it is so.
Contrary to popular misconceptions, the metamorphosis of theories into laws is not an alchemical transmutation through the crucible of exhaustive research. Theories, with their intricate tapestry of causation and underlying principles, remain distinct from the stoic and observant demeanor of laws. Theories, the architects of understanding, beckon researchers into the uncharted realms of ‘why’ and ‘how,’ while laws stoically stand guard over the ‘what’ and ‘when.’ A harmonious coexistence, a yin and yang, in the labyrinthine corridors of scientific inquiry. Buy Electronic Components, lC chips, Module Darlington, Capacitor, find chips, diode, Transistors, Sensors, IGBT at Utsource.
The Enigma of Scientific Laws
A scientific law, a mysterious revelation in its own right, serves to describe observed patterns within the natural world without delving into the intricacies of explanation. The theory, on the other hand, dons the mantle of elucidation, unraveling the enigma that the law merely outlines. These scientific laws, akin to cryptic codes, provide a framework for comprehending phenomena that may elude direct observation. In their symbiotic existence, laws and theories become the linchpin of our understanding of the cosmos, unraveling complexities that lie beyond the purview of immediate scrutiny.
Scientific theory and scientific law
You will find a list of scientific laws and theories pdf, scientific laws list, 5 scientific laws below
|Law||Field||Person(s) Named After|
|Abel’s theorem||Calculus||Niels Henrik Abel|
|Amdahl’s law||Computer science||Gene Amdahl|
|Ampère’s circuital law||Physics||André-Marie Ampère|
|Archie’s law||Geology||Gus Archie|
Axiom of Archimedes
|Arrhenius equation||Chemical kinetics||Svante Arrhenius|
|Avogadro’s law||Thermodynamics||Amedeo Avogadro|
|Bell’s theorem||Quantum mechanics||John Stewart Bell|
|Benford’s law||Mathematics||Frank Benford|
|Beer–Lambert law||Optics||August Beer, Johann Heinrich Lambert|
|Physical sciences||Daniel Bernoulli|
|Biot–Savart law||Electromagnetics, fluid dynamics||Jean Baptiste Biot and Félix Savart|
|Birch’s law||Geophysics||Francis Birch|
|Bogoliubov–Born–Green–Kirkwood–Yvon hierarchy||Physics||Nikolay Bogoliubov, Max Born, Herbert Green, John Kirkwood, and J. Yvon|
|Bogoliubov transformation||Quantum mechanics||Nikolay Bogoliubov|
|Boltzmann equation||Thermodynamics||Ludwig Boltzmann|
|Born’s law||Quantum mechanics||Max Born|
|Boyle’s law||Thermodynamics||Robert Boyle|
|Bragg’s Law||Physics||William Lawrence Bragg, William Henry Bragg|
|Bradford’s law||Computer science||Samuel C. Bradford|
|Bruun Rule||Earth science||Per Bruun|
|Buys Ballot’s law||Meteorology||C.H.D. Buys Ballot|
|Byerlee’s law||Geophysics||James Byerlee|
|Carnot’s theorem||Thermodynamics||Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot|
|Cauchy’s integral formula
See also: List of things named after Augustin-Louis Cauchy
|Complex analysis||Augustin Louis Cauchy
Augustin Louis Cauchy and Bernhard Riemann
|Cayley–Hamilton theorem||Linear algebra||Arthur Cayley and William Hamilton|
|Charles’s law||Thermodynamics||Jacques Charles|
|Chandrasekhar limit||Astrophysics||Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar|
|Church–Turing thesis||Computer science||Alonzo Church and Alan Turing|
|Coulomb’s law||Physics||Charles Augustin de Coulomb|
|Law of Charles and Gay-Lussac (frequently called Charles’s law)||Thermodynamics||Jacques Charles and Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac|
Clifford’s circle theorems
|Algebraic geometry, Geometry||William Kingdon Clifford|
|Curie’s law||Physics||Pierre Curie|
|Curie–Weiss law||Physics||Pierre Curie and Pierre-Ernest Weiss|
|Fluid dynamics, Physics||Jean le Rond d’Alembert|
|Dalton’s law of partial pressure||Thermodynamics||John Dalton|
|Darcy’s law||Fluid mechanics||Henry Darcy|
|De Bruijn–Erdős theorem||Mathematics||Nicolaas Govert de Bruijn and Paul Erdős|
|De Morgan’s law||Logic||Augustus De Morgan|
|Dermott’s law||Celestial mechanics||Stanley Dermott|
|Descartes’s theorem||Geometry||René Descartes|
Dirac delta function
See also: List of things named after Paul Dirac
|Mathematics, Physics||Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac|
|Drake equation||Cosmology||Frank Drake|
|Doppler effect||Physics||Christian Doppler|
|Ehrenfest’s theorem||Quantum mechanics||Paul Ehrenfest|
|Einstein’s general theory of relativity
Einstein’s special theory of relativity
See also: List of things named after Albert Einstein
See also: List of things named after Paul Erdős
|Mathematics||Paul Erdős and Norman H. Anning|
|Erdős–Beck theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and József Beck|
|Erdős–Gallai theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and Tibor Gallai|
|Erdős–Kac theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and Mark Kac|
|Erdős–Ko–Rado theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős, Ke Zhao, and Richard Rado|
|Erdős–Nagy theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and Béla Szőkefalvi-Nagy|
|Erdős–Rado theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and Richard Rado|
|Erdős–Stone theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and Arthur Harold Stone|
|Erdős–Szekeres theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and George Szekeres|
|Erdős–Szemerédi theorem||Mathematics||Paul Erdős and Endre Szemerédi|
|Euclid’s theorem||Number theory||Euclid|
See also: List of things named after Leonhard Euler
|Number theory||Leonhard Euler|
|Faraday’s law of induction
Faraday’s law of electrolysis
|Faxén’s law||Fluid dynamics||Hilding Faxén|
Fermat’s last theorem
Fermat’s little theorem
|Pierre de Fermat|
Fermi’s golden rule
See also: List of things named after Enrico Fermi
|Cosmology, Physics||Enrico Fermi|
|Fick’s law of diffusion||Thermodynamics||Adolf Fick|
|Fitts’s law||Ergonomics||Paul Fitts|
|Fourier’s law||Thermodynamics||Jean Baptiste Joseph Fourier|
Gauss’s law for magnetism
Gauss’s principle of least constraint
Gauss’s digamma theorem
Gauss’s hypergeometric theorem
See also: List of things named after Carl Friedrich Gauss
|Mathematics, Physics||Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss|
|Gay-Lussac’s law||Chemistry||Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac|
|Gibbs–Helmholtz equation||Thermodynamics||Josiah Willard Gibbs, Hermann Ludwig Ferdinand von Helmholtz|
|Gödel’s incompleteness theorems||Mathematics||Kurt Gödel|
|Graham’s law||Thermodynamics||Thomas Graham|
|Green’s law||Fluid dynamics||George Green|
|Grimm’s law||Linguistics||Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm|
|Gustafson’s law||Computer science||John L. Gustafson|
|Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle||Theoretical physics||Werner Heisenberg|
|Heaps’ law||LInguistics||Harold Stanley Heaps|
|Hellmann–Feynman theorem||Physics||Hans Hellmann, Richard Feynman|
|Henry’s law||Thermodynamics||William Henry|
|Hertz observations||Electromagnetism||Heinrich Hertz|
|Hess’s law||Thermodynamics||Germain Henri Hess|
|Hilbert’s basis theorem
Hilbert’s irreducibility theorem
Hilbert’s syzygy theorem
Hilbert’s Theorem 90
|Hohenberg–Kohn theorem||Quantum mechanics||Pierre Hohenberg and Walter Kohn|
Helmholtz free energy
|Hermann von Helmholtz|
|Hooke’s law||Physics||Robert Hooke|
|Hopkinson’s law||Electromagnetism||John Hopkinson|
|Hubble’s law||Cosmology||Edwin Hubble|
|Hund’s rules||Atomic physics||Friedrich Hund|
|Huygens–Fresnel principle||Optics||Christiaan Huygens and Augustin-Jean Fresnel|
|Joule’s laws||Physics||James Joule|
|Jurin’s law||Physics||James Jurin|
|Kasha’s rule||Photochemistry||Michael Kasha|
|Kepler’s laws of planetary motion||Astrophysics||Johannes Kepler|
|Kirchhoff’s laws||Electronics, thermodynamics||Gustav Kirchhoff|
|Kopp’s law||Thermodynamics||Hermann Franz Moritz Kopp|
Lagrange reversion theorem
Lagrange’s four-square theorem
Lagrange’s theorem (group theory)
See also: List of things named after Joseph-Louis Lagrange
|Mathematics, Astrophysics||Joseph-Louis Lagrange|
|Lambert’s cosine law||Physics||Johann Heinrich Lambert|
|Lamm equation||Chemistry, Biophysics||Ole Lamm|
|Langmuir equation||Surface Chemistry||Irving Langmuir|
See also: List of things named after Pierre-Simon Laplace
|Le Chatelier’s principle||Chemistry||Henri Louis le Chatelier|
|Leibniz’s law||Ontology||Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz|
|Lenz’s law||Physics||Heinrich Lenz|
|Leonard–Merritt mass estimator||Astrophysics||Peter Leonard, David Merritt|
|l’Hôpital’s rule||Mathematics||Guillaume de l’Hôpital|
|Llinás’s law||Neuroscience||Rodolfo Llinás|
|Marconi’s law||Radio technology||Guglielmo Marconi|
|Markovnikov’s rule||Organic chemistry||Vladimir Markovnikov|
|Maupertuis’s principle||Mathematics||Pierre Louis Maupertuis|
|James Clerk Maxwell|
|Mendelian inheritance/Mendel’s laws||Genetics||Gregor Mendel|
|Metcalfe’s law||Network theory||Robert Metcalfe|
|Mikheyev–Smirnov–Wolfenstein effect||Particle physics||Stanislav Mikheyev, Alexei Smirnov, and Lincoln Wolfenstein|
|Milner–Rado paradox||Mathematical logic||Eric Charles Milner and Richard Rado|
|Minkowski’s theorem||Number theory||Hermann Minkowski|
Condensed matter physics
|Moore’s law||Computing||Gordon Moore|
|Nash embedding theorem
|John Forbes Nash|
|Nernst equation||Electrochemistry||Walther Nernst|
|Newton’s law of cooling
Newton’s law of universal gravitation
Newton’s laws of motion
See also: List of things named after Isaac Newton
|Niven’s theorem||Mathematics||Ivan Niven|
|Noether’s theorem||Theoretical physics||Emmy Noether|
|Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem||Information theory||Harry Nyquist, Claude Elwood Shannon|
|Occam’s razor||Philosophy of science||William of Ockham|
|Ohm’s law||Electronics||Georg Ohm|
|Osipkov–Merritt model||Astrophysics||Leonid Osipkov, David Merritt|
|Ostwald dilution law||Physical chemistry||Wilhelm Ostwald|
|Paley–Wiener theorem||Mathematics||Raymond Paley and Norbert Wiener|
|Pauli exclusion principle||Quantum mechanics||Wolfgang Pauli|
|Peano axioms||Foundational mathematics||Giuseppe Peano|
|Planck’s law||Electromagnetism||Max Planck|
|Poincaré–Bendixson theorem||Mathematics||Henri Poincaré and Ivar Otto Bendixson|
|Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem||Mathematics||Henri Poincaré, George David Birkhoff, and Ernst Witt|
|Poincaré–Hopf theorem||Mathematics||Henri Poincaré and Heinz Hopf|
|Poincaré recurrence theorem
See also: List of things named after Henri Poincaré
|Poiseuille’s law||Fluidics||Jean Léonard Marie Poiseuille|
See also: List of things named after Siméon Denis Poisson
|Siméon Denis Poisson|
|Price’s theorem||Natural selection||George R. Price|
|Raman scattering||Physics||Sir Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman|
|Rado’s theorem||Discrete mathematics||Richard Rado|
See also: List of things named after Srinivasa Ramanujan
|Mathematics||Srinivasa Ramanujan and Trygve Nagell|
|Raoult’s law||Physical chemistry||François-Marie Raoult|
|Riemann zeta function
Riemann theta function
See also: List of things named after Bernhard Riemann
|Number theory, analysis, geometry||Bernhard Riemann|
|Rolle’s theorem||Differential calculus||Michel Rolle|
|Saha ionization equation||Plasma physics||Meghnad Saha|
|Schrödinger equation||Physics||Erwin Schrödinger|
|Sérsic’s law||Astrophysics||J. L. Sérsic|
|Snell’s law||Optics||Willebrord van Roijen Snell|
|Sokolov–Ternov effect||Particle Physics||Arsenij Sokolov and Igor Ternov|
|Sommerfeld–Kossel displacement law||Spectroscopy||Arnold Sommerfeld and Walther Kossel|
|Stefan–Boltzmann law||Thermodynamics||Jožef Stefan and Ludwig Boltzmann|
|Stokes’s law||Fluid mechanics||George Gabriel Stokes|
|Stoletov’s law||Photoelectric effect||Aleksandr Stoletov|
|Tarski’s undefinability theorem
See also: List of things named after Alfred Tarski
|Mathematical logic, Geometry||Alfred Tarski|
|Titius–Bode law||Astrophysics||Johann Daniel Titius and Johann Elert Bode|
|Torricelli’s law||Physics||Evangelista Torricelli|
|Umov effect||Physics||Nikolay Umov|
|Van der Waals equation||Chemistry||Johannes Diderik van der Waals|
|Vlasov equation||Plasma physics||Anatoly Vlasov|
|Von Neumann bicommutant theorem
Von Neumann entropy
von Neumann paradox
Von Neumann ergodic theorem
Von Neumann universe
Von Neumann neighborhood
Von Neumann’s trace inequality
See also: List of things named after John von Neumann
|Mathematics, Quantum mechanics||John von Neumann|
|Weinberg–Witten theorem||Quantum Gravity||Steven Weinberg and Edward Witten|
|Weyl character formula
See also: List of things named after Hermann Weyl
|Wien’s law||Physics||Wilhelm Wien|
|Wiener–Khinchin theorem||Mathematics||Norbert Wiener and Aleksandr Khinchin|
|Young–Laplace equation||Fluid dynamics||Thomas Young and Pierre-Simon Laplace|
|Zipf’s law||Linguistics||George Kingsley Zipf|
More Interesting Articles
- 120 World’s Greatest Inventions of the Last 100 Years
- Automation Challenges Factors and How to Overcome
- 16 Digital Transformation Trends in 2021 and Beyond
- 25 Predictions of Bad Inventions in the Future
- 35 Most Important Evergreen Inventions of All Time
- 50 Greatest Inventions of the 21st Century
- 40 Futuristic Inventions – A Prediction on Future Technologies
- 10 Excellent Inventions of the 2000s Timeline
- 30 Remarkable Inventions Made from 2000 to 2019
- 10 Steps to Learn How to Make An Invention
- 10 Popular Inventions in the Golden 1970s
- 20 Examples of Artificial Intelligence in Daily Life
- 30 Interesting Scientific Inventions and Discoveries
- 70 Inventions Made in America – Great US Inventions
- 35 Inventions Made by Accident – Accidental Inventions
- Permanent Artificial Heart – History | Mechanism | Options
- 10 Top Inventions in the 80s That Gained Huge Popularity
- 10 Invention Examples that Became Popular in the 90s